The Massachusetts Surface
Water Quality Standards desig AQUATIC LIFE - suitable
habitat for sustaining a native, naturally diverse, community of aquatic flora
and fauna. Three subclasses of aquatic life are also desig FISH CONSUMPTION -
pollutants shall not result in unacceptable concentrations in edible portions
of marketable fish or shellfish or for the recreational use of fish, shellfish,
other aquatic life or wildlife for human consumption. PRIMARY CONTACT
RECREATION - suitable for any recreation or other water use in which there is
prolonged and intimate contact with the water with a significant risk of
ingestion of water. These include, but are not limited to, wading, swimming,
diving, surfing and water skiing. SECONDARY CONTACT
RECREATION - suitable for any recreation or other water use in which contact
with the water is either incidental or accidental. These include, but are not
limited to, fishing, boating and limited contact incident to shoreline
activities. DRINKING WATER - used to
denote those waters used as a source of public drinking water. They may be
subject to more stringent regulation in accordance with the Massachusetts
Drinking Water Regulations (310 CMR 22.00). These waters are desig AGRICULTURAL AND
INDUSTRIAL - suitable for irrigation or other agricultural process water and
for compatible industrial cooling and process water. SHELLFISH HARVESTING (in SA and SB segments) – Class SA
waters in approved areas (Open Shellfish Areas) shellfish harvested without
depuration shall be suitable for consumption; Class SB waters in approved areas
(Restricted Shellfish Areas) shellfish harvested with depuration shall be
suitable for consumption. AESTHETICS - all surface
waters shall be free from pollutants in concentrations or combinations that settle
to form objectionable deposits; float as debris, scum or other matter to form
nuisances; produce objectionable odor, color, taste or turbidity; or produce
undesirable or nuisance species of aquatic life. Other restrictions, which denote specific subcategories of
use assigned to the segment that, may affect the application of criteria or
specific antidegradation provision of 314 CMR 4.00 which are specified in
segments of the North Coastal Watersheds include: Combined Sewer Overflow
(CSO) – These waters are identified as impacted by the discharge of combined
sewer overflows in the classification tables in 314 CMR 4.06(3). The permitting
authority without a variance or partial use designation may allow overflow
events where the provisions 314 CMR 4.06(1)(d)10 are met. The waterbody may be
subject to short-term impairment of swimming or other recreational uses, but
support these uses through most of their annual period of use; and the aquatic
life community may suffer some adverse impact yet is still generally viable). The guidance used to
assess each desig This use is suitable for
sustaining a native, naturally diverse, community of aquatic flora and fauna.
The results of biological (and habitat), toxicological, and chemical data are
integrated to assess this use. The nature, frequency, and precision of the
DEP’s data collection techniques dictate that a weight of evidence be used to
make the assessment, with biosurvey results used as the final arbiter of
borderline cases. Excursions from criteria due to natural conditions are not
considered impairment of use. The following chart provides an overview of the
guidance used to assess the status (support, partial support, non support) of
the Aquatic Life Use:Appendix J. Desig
J1. AQUATIC LIFE USE
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support—Data
available clearly indicates support. Minor excursions from chemical criteria
(Table 3) may be tolerated if the biosurvey results demonstrate support. |
Partial Support –
Uncertainty about support in the chemical or toxicity testing data, or there
is some minor modification of the biological community. Excursions not
frequent or prolonged. |
Non Support –
There are frequent or severe violations of chemical criteria, presence of
acute toxicity, or a moderate or severe modification of the biological
community. |
|
BIOLOGY |
|||
|
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol
(RBP) II or III (4) |
Non-Impaired |
Slightly Impaired |
Moderately or Severely
Impaired |
|
Fish Community (4) |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
|
Habitat and Flow (4) |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
Dry Streambed due to
artificial regulation or channel alteration |
|
Macrophytes (4) |
No non-native plant species present, BPJ |
Non-native plant species
present but not dominant, BPJ* |
Non-native plant species
dominant, BPJ* |
|
Plankton/ Periphyton (4) |
No algal blooms |
Occasional algal blooms |
Persistent algal blooms |
|
TOXICITY TESTS |
|||
|
Water Column (4) |
>75% survival either 48 hr
or 7-day exposure |
>50 - <75%
survival either 48 hr or 7-day exposure |
<50%
survival either 48 hr or 7-day exposure |
|
Effluent (4) |
Meets permit limits |
(NOTE: if limit is not met,
the stream is listed as threatened for 1.0 river mile downstream from the
discharge.) |
|
|
Sediment (4) |
>75% survival |
>50 - <75%
survival |
<50%
survival |
|
CHEMISTRY- WATER |
|||
|
DO (3, 6) |
Criteria (Table 3) |
Criteria exceeded in 11-25%
of measurements. |
Criteria exceeded >25% of
measurements. |
|
pH (3, 6) |
Criteria (Table 3) |
Criteria exceeded in 11-25%
of measurements. |
Criteria exceeded >25% of
measurements. |
|
Temperature (3, 6) *** |
Criteria (Table 3), *** |
Criteria exceeded in 11-25%
of measurements. |
Criteria exceeded >25% of
measurements. |
|
Turbidity (4) |
D 5 NTU due to a discharge |
BPJ* |
BPJ * |
|
Suspended Solids (4) |
25 mg/L max., D10
mg/L due to a discharge |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
|
Nutrients (3) Phosphate-P (4) |
Table 3, (Site-Specific
Criteria; Maintain Balanced Biocommunity, no pH/DO violations) |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
|
Toxic Pollutants (3, 6) Ammonia-N (3, 4) Chlorine (3, 6) |
Criteria (Table 3) 0.254 mg/L**** NH3-N 0.011 mg/L TRC |
Criterion is exceeded in <
10% of samples. |
Criterion is exceed in >
10% of samples. |
|
CHEMISTRY – SEDIMENT |
|||
|
Toxic Pollutants (5) |
< L-EL*****
|
One pollutant between L-EL
and S-EL |
One pollutant ³ S-EL |
|
Nutrients (5) |
< L-EL |
between L-EL and S-EL |
³ S-EL |
|
Metal Normalization to Al or
Fe (4) |
Enrichment Ratio < 1 |
Enrichment Ratio >1 but <10 |
Enrichment Ratio >10 |
|
CHEMISTRY- EFFLUENT |
|||
|
Compliance with permit limits
(4) |
In-compliance with all limits |
NOTE: If the facility is not
in compliance with their permit limits, the information is used to threaten
one river mile downstream from the discharge. |
|
|
CHEMISTRY-TISSUE |
|||
|
PCBs – whole fish (1) |
<500 mg/Kg
wet weight |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
|
DDT (2) |
<14.0 mg/Kg
wet weight |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
|
PCBs in aquatic tissue (2) |
<0.79
ng TEQ/Kg wet weight |
BPJ* |
BPJ* |
*BPJ = Best Professional Judgment, ***maximum daily mean temp. in a month (minimum of 6 measurements evenly
distributed over 24-hours) <criterion, ****Ammonia
levels for pH of 9.0, actual “criterion” varies with pH and is evaluated
case-by-case, *****L-EL
= Low Effect Level and S-EL = Severe Effect
Level
Pollutants shall not result in unacceptable concentrations in edible portions of marketable fish or shellfish or for the recreational use of fish, shellfish, other aquatic life or wildlife for human consumption. This assessment is made using the most recent list of Fish Consumption Advisories issued by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Department of Public Health (MA DPH), Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment Fish Consumption Advisory List. Following is an overview of the guidance used to assess the status (support, partial support, non-support) of the fish consumption use.
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support —No
restrictions or bans in effect |
Partial Support – A
“restricted consumption” fish advisory is in effect for the general
population or a sub-population that could be at potentially greater risk
(e.g., pregnant women, and children |
Non Support – A
“no consumption” advisory or ban in effect for the general population or a
sub-population for one or more fish species; or there is a commercial fishing
ban in effect |
|
MA DPH Fish Consumption
Advisory List (8) |
Not applicable, precluded by
statewide advisory (Hg) |
Not applicable |
Waterbody on MA DPH Fish
Consumption Advisory List |
* NOTE:
In 1994, MA DPH issued
a statewide Interim Freshwater Fish Consumption
Advisory for mercury. This precautionary measure was aimed at pregnant
women only; the general public was not considered to be at risk from fish
consumption. The advisory encompasses all freshwaters in
Drinking Water Use denotes those waters used as a source of
public drinking water. These waters may be subject to more stringent regulation
in accordance with the Massachusetts Drinking Water Regulations (310 CMR
22.00). They are desig
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support-- No
closures or advisories (no contaminants with confirmed exceedances of MCLs,
conventional treatment is adequate to maintain the supply). |
Partial Support – Is
one or more advisories or more than conventional treatment is required |
Non Support – One
or more contamination-based closures of the water supply |
|
Drinking Water Program (DWP)
Evaluation |
Reported by DWP |
Reported by DWP |
Reported by DWP |
This use is assessed
using information from the Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental
Law Enforcement’s Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF). The information is in the
form of various classifications of shellfish closures and restrictions.
Shellfish areas under management orders are not
assessed.
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support – SA Waters—open for shellfish
harvesting without depuration (Open areas) SB Waters—open for shellfish
harvesting with depuration (Open, conditionally approved, restricted areas) |
Partial
Support – SA Waters—Seasonally
closed, seasonally open, conditionally approved, conditionally restricted SB
Waters—Seasonally closed, seasonally open, conditionally restricted areas |
Non Support – SA Waters—Prohibited, areas SB Waters— Prohibited, areas |
|
Division of Marine Fisheries
Shellfish Project Classification Area Information (11) |
Reported by DMF |
Reported
by DMF |
Reported by DMF |
This use is suitable for any recreational or other water use in which there is prolonged and intimate contact with the water with a significant risk of ingestion of water (1 April to 15 October). These include, but are not limited to, wading, swimming, diving, surfing and water skiing. The chart below provides an overview of the guidance used to assess the status (support, partial support, non-support) of the primary contact use.
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support--
Criteria are met, no aesthetic conditions that preclude the use |
Partial Support
–Criteria exceeded intermittently (neither frequent nor prolonged), marginal
aesthetic violations |
Non Support
–Frequent or prolonged violations of criteria, formal bathing area closures, or severe aesthetic conditions that
preclude the use |
|
Fecal Coliform Bacteria (3,
9) * |
Criteria met OR Dry Weather Guidance <5 samples--<400/100
ml maximum Wet Weather Guidance Dry weather samples meet and
wet samples <2000/100 ml |
Guidance exceeded in 11-25%
of the samples OR Wet Weather Dry weather samples meet and
wet samples >2000/100 ml |
Guidance exceeded in > 25%
of the samples |
|
pH (3, 6) |
Criteria exceeded in <10
% of the measurements |
Criteria exceeded in 11-25%
of the measurements |
Criteria exceeded in >25%
of the measurements |
|
Temperature (3) |
Criteria met |
Criteria exceeded 11-25% of
the time |
Criteria exceeded 25% of the
time |
|
Color and Turbidity (3, 6) |
D 5 NTU (due to a discharge)
exceeded in <10 % of the measurements |
Guidance exceeded in 11-25%
of the measurements |
Guidance exceeded in >25%
of the measurements |
|
Secchi disk depth (10) ** |
Lakes - >1.2 meters
( > 4’) |
Infrequent excursions from
the guidance |
Frequent and/or prolonged
excursions from the guidance |
|
Oil & Grease (3) |
Criteria met |
Criteria exceeded 11-25% of the time |
Criteria exceeded >25% of the time |
|
Aesthetics (3) Biocommunity (4)** |
No nuisance organisms that
render the water aesthetically objectionable or unusable; Lakes – cover of macrophytes
< 50% of lake area at maximum extent of growth. |
Lakes – cover of macrophytes
50-75% of lake area at their maximum extent of growth. |
Lakes – cover of macrophytes
>75% of lake area at their maximum extent of growth. |
Note: Excursions from criteria
due to natural conditions are not considered impairment of use. The Primary
Contact Use support status cannot be rated higher then Secondary Contact. * Fecal Coliform Bacteria
interpretations require additional information in order to apply this use
assessment guidance. Bacteria data results (fecal coliform) are interpreted
according to whether they represent dry weather or wet weather (stormwater
runoff) conditions. Accordingly it is important to interpret the amount of
precipitation received in the subject region immediately prior to sampling and
streamflow conditions. **
Lakes exhibiting impairment of the primary contact recreation use (swimmable)
because of macrophyte cover and/or transparency (Secchi disk depth) are
assessed as either partial or on support. If no fecal coliform
bacteria data are available and the lake (entirely or in part) met the
transparency (Secchi disk depth) and aesthetics guidance this use is not assessed.
This use is suitable for any recreation or other water use in which contact with the water is either incidental or accidental. These include, but are not limited to, fishing, boating and limited contact incident to shoreline activities. Following is an overview of the guidance used to assess the status (support, partial support, non-support) of the secondary contact use.
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support--
Criteria are met, no aesthetic conditions that preclude the use |
Partial Support
–Criteria exceeded intermittently (neither frequent nor prolonged), marginal
aesthetic violations |
Non Support
–Frequent or prolonged violations of criteria, or severe aesthetic conditions
that preclude the use |
|
Fecal Coliform Bacteria (4) * |
Dry Weather Guidance <5 samples--<2000/100
ml maximum >5 samples--<1000/100
ml geometric mean < 10%
samples >2000/100 ml Wet Weather Guidance Dry weather samples meet and
wet samples <4000/100 ml |
Wet Weather Guidance Dry weather samples meet and
wet samples >4000/100 ml |
Criteria exceeded in dry
weather |
|
Oil & Grease (3) |
Criteria met |
Criteria exceeded 11-25% of the time |
Criteria exceeded >25% of the time |
|
Aesthetics (3) Biocommunity (4) ** |
No nuisance organisms that
render the water aesthetically objectionable or unusable; Lakes – cover of
macrophytes < 50% of lake area at their maximum extent of growth. |
Macrophyte cover is between
50 – 75% |
Macrophyte cover exceeds 75%
of the lake area. |
Note:
Excursions from criteria due to natural conditions are not considered
impairment of use. The Secondary Contact
Use support status cannot be higher then the Aesthetics Use status. * Fecal Coliform Bacteria interpretations require
additional information in order to apply this use assessment guidance. Bacteria
data results (fecal coliform) are interpreted according to whether they
represent dry weather or wet weather (stormwater runoff) conditions.
Accordingly it is important to interpret the amount of precipitation received
in the study region immediately prior to sampling and streamflow conditions. ** In lakes if no fecal coliform data are
available, macrophyte cover is the only criterion used to assess the secondary
contact recreational use.
For the Primary and Secondary Contact Recreational uses the following steps are taken to interpret the fecal coliform bacteria results:
Identify the range of fecal coliform bacteria results,
Calculate the geometric mean (monthly, seasonally, or on dataset), (Note: the geometric mean is only calculated on datasets with >5 samples collected in a 30-day period.)
Calculate the % of sample results exceeding 400 cfu/100 mL,
Determine if the samples were collected during wet or dry weather conditions (review precipitation and streamflow data),
Dry weather can be defined as: No/trace antecedent (to the sampling event) precipitation that causes more than a slight increase in stream flow.
Wet weather can be defined as: Precipitation antecedent to
the sampling event that results in a marked increase in stream flow.
Apply the following to interpret dry weather data:
<10% of the samples exceed criteria (step 2 and 3, above) assessed as Support,
11-25% of the samples exceed criteria (step 2 and 3, above) assessed as Partial Support,
>25% of the samples exceed criteria (step 2 and 3, above)
assessed as Non Support.
All surface waters shall be free from pollutants in concentrations or combinations that settle to form objectionable deposits; float as debris, scum or other matter to form nuisances; produce objectionable odor, color, taste or turbidity; or produce undesirable or nuisance species of aquatic life. The aesthetic use is closely tied to the public health aspects of the recreational uses (swimming and boating). Below is an overview of the guidance used to assess the status (support, partial support, non-support) of the aesthetics use.
|
Variable (# indicates reference) |
Support— 1.No objectionable bottom deposits, floating
debris, scum, or nuisances; 2. objectionable odor, color, taste or turbidity,
or nuisance aquatic life |
Partial Support – Objectionable conditions neither frequent nor
prolonged |
Non Support – Objectionable conditions frequent and/or
prolonged |
|
Aesthetics (3)* Visual observation (4) |
Criteria met |
BPJ (spatial and temporal
extent of degradation) |
BPJ (extent of spatial and
temporal degradation |
Note: Excursions from criteria
due to natural conditions are not considered impairment of use.
For lakes, the aesthetic use category is generally
assessed at the same level of impairment as the more severely impaired
recreational use category (primary or secondary contact).